Having analysed different aspects of the concept of scientific knowledge of Karl Popper, we see that existence in the conditions of open society assumes not search of the positive bases (as they conduct to restriction of freedom though actually they do not exist), and on a solution of the problem of search of preferences in concrete situations.
one correct reflections or experiments conduct to opening. Myths, metaphysical designs, dreams, hallucinations can provoke them also. However they have to be controllable and reasonable, be confirmed by the facts.
The ideological contents of theories of falsification and demarcation have valuable value which brings us to world outlook measurement. Of Popper the idea which took the belief form about absence of any truth in science and any criterion of its identification is the cornerstone of the concept of "logic of opening"; the sense of scientific activity is reduced not to search of truth, and to identification and detection of mistakes and delusions. This, inherently, world outlook idea determined also the relevant structure:
Certainly, the social methodology of the theorist of "open society" is not absolute. In particular, she hardly perceives value of "traditions", in general historical heritage. However, the car intended for processing of a tree is not always capable to process metal. The logical method of Karl Popper accepts inevitability of borders behind which search of new decisions is necessary.
Therefore the problem of philosophy consists in finding such way which would allow us to come nearer to truth. In the logiko-methodological concept of Popper there is such mechanism in the form of the principle of falsification. The philosopher considers that only those provisions which are disproved by empirical data can be scientific. The Oproverzhimost of theories the science facts, therefore, admits "logic of a discovery" criterion of scientific character of these theories.
At first sight this situation is perceived as nonsense: if it becomes clear that all those our speculative designs which we build concerning the world are disproved by our empirical experience, that, proceeding their common sense, it would be necessary to recognize them false and to throw out as insolvent. However popperovsky reasonings are under construction on other logical sense.
In the preface to "Logic of a discovery" Popper already characterizes the philosophy of science as involved in cosmology — "to knowledge of the world, including ourselves (and our knowledge as part of this world". "All science — Popper writes — there is a cosmology, and for me value of philosophy not to a lesser extent, than sciences, consists only in that contribution which it makes in its development" 6
This structure is the structure comprehended and accepted at the world outlook level by Popper and realized by it in science. However therefore influence of world outlook belief on the model of development of science created by the thinker.
Moreover, demarcation "orthodox and heterodox interpretations is accepted now in literature on philosophy of quantum mechanics. In particular that physicists and philosophers who emphasize that go against the stream insist on it and try to solve those problems which "orthodoxes" consider closed.
It is possible to prove anything. In it art of sophists was shown, for example. Popper considers that the scientific provisions stating about existence of material objects belong not to the class confirmed by experience, and, on the contrary, - disproved by experience because the logic of a world order and our thinking prompts to us that the scientific theories refuted by the facts really bear in themselves information on objectively existing world.
Thus the most important line of creativity of Popper is that, going in for science philosophy, he did not lay aside a problem of social development; with these problems it was connected by the subjects of scientific rationality and criticism refracting a subject of spiritual freedom of the person in science philosophy.
The verification criterion of theoretical statements declared itself the limitation soon, having caused numerous criticism in the address. The narrowness of a method of verification first of all affected philosophy because it appeared that the philosophical offers which are not verified as are deprived of empirical value. Points X to this party of a lack of the doctrine of logical positivism. Patnem1